Benefits of Social Performance Management for Stakeholders

SPM has a large impact on various stakeholders:
  • enables clients to receive better tailored products and services; investment costs in product development and innovation are targeted;
  • increases the clients’ needs and preference satisfaction and effectively improves their living conditions; the drop out rates decrease;
  • Socially responsible investors and donors have a simple and cost-effective tool to assess social results of the MFI;
  • staff can get a better and fuller understanding of their work and become more client focused ;
  • board members can easily monitor the fulfilment of the social goals;
  • the whole organisation benefits from a better decision making process through better balancing of financial and social objectives.

Examples of how SPM was successfully used in MFIs:
  • PRIZMA, Bosnia and Herzegovina, strengthened management systems and commitment to mission, and redesigned staff incentives to reflect this.

  • CARD, Philippines, understood problems of paying for others in repayment leading to drop-out and reduced its drop-out rate.

  • LAPO, Nigeria, used MIS system to identify patterns and trends in client progress and pin-pointed issues to explore further.

  • SAT, Ghana, discovered that women were less confident than men about taking on individual asset loans and has now developed a training programme designed to improve confidence.

  • SEF, South Africa, monitors ‘vulnerable centres’ with proxy impact indicators as an early warning system.

  • ODEF, Honduras, has found that effective collection and use of social performance information can lead to better client retention, resulting in improved financial sustainability.
Some examples from the SPM Working Group members hard work implementing and institutionalizing SPM:
  • AgroInvest, Serbia, Montenegro, was one of the MFIs which pilot tested the QAT and as a result they are now in the process of including Social Performance Management in all future plans and they are introducing Social Performance Indicators into their MIS and SIS.
  • Aregak, Armenia, have included the Social Performance perspective in their Business Plan, they have also made sure that a social performance focus is incorporated in the organizational culture.
  • MDF, Serbia, have identified and filled in the gaps in the organization, especially in the information area they have also successfully communicated the SPM message through staff trainings and a motivated SPM working team
  • Partner, Bosnia and Herzegovina, have come a long way in institutionalizing the everyday procedures regarding SPM, they have managed this since there is a strong support and commitment from the management level in Partner as well as the Board.
  • Women for Women International, Bosnia and Herzegovina, have successfully communicated the message of SPM in their organization which has resulted in strong engagement and commitment from all levels in the MFI, from Board to Loan Officer.