Advancing Social Performance Management as a part of a global venture
As part of a pioneering initiative in the global microfinance industry the MFC is implementing the region wide program Advancing Social Performance Management.
For more information please go to Social Performance Resource Center at the Microfinance Gateway.

Some examples of other global initiatives are briefly presented below:

1. International Task Force on Social Performance

In March 2005, the International Task Force on Social Performance (ITFSP) was launched in Paris. The Argidius Foundation, the Ford Foundation and CGAP brought together leaders from various social performance initiatives in the microfinance industry to come to an agreement on a common social performance framework and to develop an action plan to move the social performance agenda forward. A nine-point action-plan focused on seeing increased coordination and collaboration of action to ensure greater social focus and transparency in performance management and reporting in microfinance was developed. MFC is part of the group from the very beginning. MFC represents regional MFIs as well as reports on its on-going activities in the area of social performance.
For more information about the current group activities and planned meetings, please contact Laura Foose lfoose@alternative-credit.com.

Traditional evaluation has focused on end results and impact, however impact is only one aspect of Social Performance. The figure below shows the different dimensions of Social Performance.



2. CGAP Donor Working Group on Social Performance


After the SP Task Force was formed donor agency representatives felt the need to form a working group, which would aim primarily on the coordination of efforts. The group works on developing good donor practice in social performance, and supports the development of industry standards and benchmarks for social performance.
The first meeting of the Donor Working Group was held on 9 November 2005 in Mexico. The principle goal and objectives of CGAP Donor WG were established:

Principal Goal: to harmonise efforts, create synergies and avoid fragmentation.

Objectives: CGAP Donor WG will facilitate:
  1. the spread and practice of pro-poor Social Performance Management through the financing of specific training courses and action-research, and integration of the social dimension of Microfinance in existing courses which focus primarily on financial performance;
  2. the establishment of industry social performance standards, and the development and spread of easy-to-read, customised reporting formats for different categories of stakeholders;
  3. dissemination of globally applicable guidelines for social performance assessment, reporting and rating, thus enhancing the transparency of social reporting and social achievements by individual institutions and by the sector as a whole;
  4. the establishment of an easily accessible virtual knowledge, resource and communication centre on theory and practice of Social Performance Management, Assessment, Reporting, Auditing and Rating;
  5. identification of cases of the best practice in the areas of SP governance and SP management, and make them known (e.g. through launching a Social Performance Transparency Award);
  6. support of the integration of the SP reporting system into the MIX and Micro Banking Bulletin, with a view of introducing the double bottom line reporting into an international platform (financial and social) as a regular practice in the MF industry.

    ‘Facilitation’ can be done by
    a. the provision of financial resources at the appropriate time, for the right type of initiative, in a coordinated fashion
    b. active participation in an ongoing dialogue among stakeholders (including MFIs and MFI networks) about the best way in which donors can support the SP agenda (‘best donor practice’).



3. Social Assesment, Audit and Rating



COMPLIANCE AUDITS

The UK social audit network (SAN) has developed guidance and training for social accounting and auditing. This mirrors a traditional financial audit in that it involves the preparation of a set of social accounts, and audits this. It also uses a stakeholder-based approach, gathering perspectives from a range of stakeholders and auditing the social accounts through a half day meeting involving the key stakeholders of the organisation rather than an assessor site visit. For more information please go to www.socialauditnetwork.org.uk


BENCHMARK AUDITS

Performance Audit Tool (SPA), USAID The SPA tool uses a scorecard to assess social performance using a set of simple indicators falling under one of seven dimensions of outreach: breadth, depth, length, cost, scope, worth, and outreach to the community. A number of indicators are defined, and points are awarded depending on the organisation’s status in relation to each indicator. For example under the dimension of depth of outreach one indicator is percentage of women clients; zero .are awarded if less than 20% of the clients are women, one point for 20 – 50%, and 3 points for greater than 50%. The scorecard thus describes ‘desirable’ characteristics, and allows for comparison and benchmarking between organisations. More information about the USAID SPA please go to www.microlinks.org

ACCION, SOCIAL tool evaluates the success of the microfinance institution in fulfilling its social mission and contributing to broadly accepted social goals. The tool assesses six dimensions of social performance: social mission, outreach, client service, information transparency and consumer protection, association with the community, and labour climate. It consists of interviews with management, staff, board members and clients; strategic plan/business plan, minutes of Board of Directors meetings; MFI client database; available external survey data to validate the MFI database; secondary source data (national data, MIX, market studies); map of geographic coverage; and branch visits. For more information about the SOCAL tool please go to www.accion.org

CERISE Social Performance Indicators Initiative
The SPII is a joint venture of CERISE, CGAP, and the Argidius Foundation. The objective of the SPII is to articulate a conceptual framework for defining social performance in microfinance and to develop a set of social performance indicators for MFIs with broad social relevance. The tool is a questionnaire and a guide on how to use it and it is aimed at evaluating the intentions, actions and corrective measures implemented by an MFI in order to determine whether it has the available means to attain its social objectives.
The questionnaire consists of about 60 weighted questions on:

  - outreach to the poor and excluded
  - services and products adapted to the needs of target clients
  - effects of the products on the clients
  - corporate social responsibility – relationship with other stakeholders

The questions give an impression on the social performance results itself as indicating up to what extent social performance management tools are developed within an MFI. It can easily be used as checklist or scorecard indicating the level of advancement in social performance instruments within an MFI, without a need for very specific MIS-data.

PROCESS AUDITS

There is another type of audit which includes the QAT, which examines the status and effectiveness of the organizational systems.Two examples of these are the International standards Organisation (ISO) quality management auditing for ISO0001:2000 and the USAID SPA tool.

The ISO 9001:2000 describes standards for process management auditing. This implies a different approach to auditing, away from compliance-based systems and the related views of what constitutes objective evidence.

The USAID SPA focuses on alignment of organisational systems with their social mission, and therefore is broadly comparable with the QAT, but it is not specifically aligned to the SPM process. In addition to the SPA scorecard the tool uses a subjective audit of the MFI’s commitment and capacity to achieve social return in five key internal processes. These are internal communication and management leadership, hiring and training, monitoring systems, incentive systems, and strategic planning.

The MFI’s performance on the scorecard and in the five key internal processes form the basis for awarding the microfinance institution a social rating score, which indicates the microfinance institution’s likelihood of creating significant social impact both now and in the future.



4. Commitment letter

Recently, a coalition of MFIs, donors, investors, rating agencies, and microfinance networks circulated and signed a statement committing themselves or their organisations to promoting social performance in microfinance. MFC joined a group of over 35 microfinance practitioners, donors, raters, and investors to endorse a common statement of principles in support of social performance.The text of the letter is presented below:


Declaration of Principles


Promoting Social Performance in Microfinance: Toward a ‘Double Bottom Line’

“Microfinance works best when it measures – and discloses – its performance; accurate, standardised performance information is imperative, both financial information and social information” (from the G8-endorsed CGAP “Key Principles of Microfinance”).

As leaders in the field of microfinance, we the undersigned:

1. Define social performance as the effective translation of an institution’s social goals into practice (actions, corrective measures, outcome). 1

2. Recognise that financial performance alone is insufficient to achieve our goal of serving increasing numbers of poor and excluded people sustainably. Success in microfinance is driven by a double-bottom line: strong financial and social performance, and that these twin measures are mutually reinforcing in the long run.

3. Further recognise a growing interest from donors, networks, practitioners, rating agencies, funders, and other stakeholders in testing, applying and improving new tools for social performance management, assessment, monitoring and reporting.

4. Support recent developments in the field of monitoring social performance. Many actors developed new tools, all of which have the same objective of promoting social performance, but which offer different approaches.

5. Commit to improving the social impact of microfinance by:

  • Becoming pioneers in the practice of regularly assessing, reporting on, and managing by the social performance of our organisations and the organisations we support
  • Setting clearly specified social objectives for our own organisations and criteria for the organisations we support
  • Designing, introducing and using systems to manage, assess, monitor, and report inside and outside our organisation on social performance
  • Using information on social performance to improve our operations
  • Remaining open to external auditing of our social results
  • Promoting and exchanging ideas and information on social performance.

Download Declaration of Principles from www.triasngo.be.


 1The social value of microfinance relates to improving the lives of poor and excluded clients and their families and widening the range of opportunities for communities.
To create this value the social objectives of an MFI may include:
  • Serving an increasing number of poor and excluded people sustainably - expanding and deepening outreach to poorer people
  • Improving the quality and appropriateness of financial services available to the target clients through the systematic assessment of their specific needs
  • Creating benefits for the clients of microfinance, their families and communities relating to social capital and social links, assets, reduction in vulnerability, income, access to services, and fulfillment of basic needs.
  • Improving the social responsibility of the MFI towards its employees, its clients and the community it serves.